The Credit Scoring Site A bleak account 

False information published by Forbes, Part 2

After Forbes' appears incognizant, the even more direct approach

| By Greg Fisher

Hello, Forbes and People of the Future. I'll publish this first, then email it to the Forbes corrections address.

Forbes, what is wrong with you? You published false information and have not corrected it. Are you just playing dumb? You instruct readers to contact a writer directly "via their social accounts."

That I did in Part 1. At least you got the yourdomain/contact convention right. And even corrections@yourdomain.com! That's good!

Your execution, however, is another thing. I am pretty sure that, by now, you know who I am and what my beef is: False information is bad.

But here we are, again. Do you actually enjoy having your name associated with the words false information? Let's get it in the record: Forbes' false information.

Part 1, Part 2, Part X-- you know, numbers are infinite.

Right?

And, simple copy/paste of social media messages makes this task (berating you mercilessly) a walk in the park on a spring day in New Yorky City.

And then there's the meta thing.

So get on with it.

For edification, here are some names and titles.

Mike Federle, CEO #TopPerson

MariaRosa Cartolano, General Counsel

Bill Hankes, Chief Communications Officer

Randall [The Hat] Lane, Chief Content Officer

Moira [The Embodiment] Forbes, Executive Vice President, Forbes Media; President & Publisher, ForbesWomen

Now you might think that I am making fun of you-- and you would be right! You deserve it.

Stop being pathetic. Correct your errors today. #falseinformation

Sheesh. You're like a bunch of teenagers.




Back to top